I found this
week’s lectures and readings quite fascinating because until now I had never
seen the connection between medical technologies, such as the x-ray or the MRI,
and art. As Victoria Vesna retrospectively notes in Medicine pt1, only years after her tedious art classes that
revolved around the human anatomy did she realise that this knowledge “proved
to be critical for the work that [Vesna] was doing”.
![]() |
Figure 1 - Photo of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, discoverer of the X-ray http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_R%C3%B6ntgen#/media/File:Roentgen2.jpg |
Another example of
art using medical technologies and knowledge as inspiration on works on the
human body is the travelling exhibition “Body Worlds”, developed and promoted
by Gunther von Hagens. Its works focuses on a process known as “plastination”
which “is a technique…used in anatomy to preserve bodies or body parts”
developed by von Hagens in 1977 (Wikipedia).
Having seen the exhibits myself, I could not help but feel conflicted between
horror and fascination. Through these exhibits, I feel that the human anatomy
can be somewhat dumbed-down for the general public to see and understand for
educational purposes; on the Body Worlds website, Von Hagen confirms this as he
hopes “for the exhibitions to be places of enlightenment and contemplation”. As
I was quite young, I didn’t have much understanding or interest in these works,
but now I have a much deeper admiration for von Hagens’ amazing albeit weird
innovation.
![]() |
Figure 2 - An example of an exhibit from Body Worlds examining the "cycle of life" http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01014/body_worlds_pregna_1014471c.jpg |
However, while
medicine and technology allow artists to closely examine and understand the
human body, it was in fact art that allowed medicine and technology to thrive
in the first place, as we see from the beginnings of human dissections. Vesna
notes that artists played a “critical role” in the first human dissections,
helping doctors and researchers to document the progress and understanding of
the body by visualising and recreating images of the body’s internal structure.
Thus, it can be concluded that without art, not only would our understanding
and knowledge of the human body be severely limited, but also hinder the
progress of technological advances in medical procedures.
![]() |
Figure 3 - Cover of Gray's Anatomy, extremely influential anatomy textbook written by Henry Gray |
A more modern
example of how art can be used to aid medicine and technology can be found in
Donald Ingber’s The Architecture of Life.
In his book, the way he describes the body is much like how an architect
describes a building; in fact Ingber notes how “both organic and inorganic
matter are made of the same building blocks” (48). His understanding and
knowledge of architecture has allowed him to view the human body in ways that
many could not see; Ingber’s “early scientific work led to the discovery that
tensegrity architecture…is a fundamental design principle that governs how
living systems are structured” according to Wikipedia.
Citations
- Medicine Pt1. Perf. Victoria Vesna. Youtube. N.p., 21 Apr. 2012. Web. 25 Apr. 2015
- "Plastination." Wikipedia. N.p., 13 Apr. 2015. Web. 25 Apr. 2015. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastination#History>.
- "A Life in Science - Gunther Von Hagens." Body Worlds. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2015. <http://www.bodyworlds.com/en/gunther_von_hagens/life_in_science.html>.
- Ingber, Donald E. The Architecture of Life. N.p.: Scientific American, 1997. PDF.
- "Donald E. Ignber." Wikipedia. N.p., 7 Apr. 2015. Web. 25 Apr. 2015. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_E._Ingber>.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI agree completely about how simplifying the scientific exhibits and process can make it easier for the public to understand complex things. Dissecting bodies is a great way to understand them and it gives real life importance to each organ (compared to textbook pictures). In this same way, I too also never saw the connection between art and medicine and took for granted the complex imagery in X-Rays for example. I like how you related the architecture of the body to understanding function.
Good work